Comprehensive Study for Breast Cancer Using Deep Learning and Traditional Machine Learning

نویسندگان

چکیده

Breast cancer is one of the most dangerous diseases and second largest cause women death. Techniques methods have been adopted for early indications disease signs as it’s only effective way managing breast in women. This review explores techniques used Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) using image analysis, deep learning traditional machine learning. It primarily gives an introduction to various strategies learning, followed by explanation particular architectures detection their classification. After review, researcher recommended need inclusion because it performs multi-functions enabling medical diagnosis. Also, important involve integration more than improve process diagnostic imaging benefits limitations, recent advancements development are discussed reviewing existing secondary sources. study reviews papers published from 2015 (early publications on cancer) 2021. paper a latest works done field with future trends problems categorization REFERENCE: AHMED, L., IQBAL, M. M., ALDABBAS, H., KHALID, S., SALEEM, Y. & SAEED, S. 2020. Images data practices semantic segmentation neural network. Journal Ambient Intelligence Humanized Computing, 1-17. AKBAR, AKRAM, U., SHARIF, TARIQ, A. KHAN, 2018. Decision support system hypertensive retinopathy arteriovenous ratio. Artificial intelligence medicine, 90, 15-24. AL MOHAMMAD, B., BRENNAN, P. C. MELLO-THOMS, 2017. A lung screening role computer-aided detection. Clinical radiology, 72, 433-442. AMIT, G., HASHOUL, KISILEV, P., OPHIR, WALACH, E. ZLOTNICK, Automatic dual-view mass full-field digital mammograms. International Conference Medical Image Computing Computer-Assisted Intervention, 2015. Springer, 44-52. ARAFA, A., EL-SOKARY, N., ASAD, HEFNY, H. 2019. Computer-aided based GMM SVM. Arab Nuclear Sciences Applications, 52, 142-150. ASHOUR, DEY, N. MOHAMED, W. 2016. Abdominal clinical applications: Computer aided diagnosis approaches. applications. Springer. BAFFA, D. F. O. LATTARI, L. G. Convolutional networks static dynamic infrared 2018 31st SIBGRAPI Graphics, Patterns (SIBGRAPI), IEEE, 174-181. BENHASSINE, E., BOUKAACHE, BOUDJEHEM, 2020a. Classification mammogram images energy probability frequency domain discriminative power coefficients. Imaging Systems Technology, 30, 45-56. 2020b. new CAD System Cancer Discrimination Power Analysis Wavelet’s Coefficients Support Vector Machine. Mechanics Medicine Biology, 20, 2050036. BERA, K., SCHALPER, K. RIMM, VELCHETI, V. MADABHUSHI, pathology—new tools precision oncology. Nature oncology, 16, 703-715. BHARAT, POOJA, REDDY, R. Using algorithms risk prediction 3rd Circuits, Control, Communication (I4C), 1-4. BYRA, GALPERIN, OJEDA‐FOURNIER, OLSON, O'BOYLE, COMSTOCK, ANDRE, classification sonography transfer convolutional network color conversion. physics, 46, 746-755. CAI, WANG, X., Y., GUO, YU, J. Robust phase-based texture descriptor ultrasound images. Biomedical engineering online, 14, 1-21. CHAURASIA, V., PAL, TIWARI, B. Prediction benign malignant mining techniques. Algorithms Computational 12, 119-126. CHEN, D., QIAN, SHI, PAN, Q. malignancy incremental combination multiple recurrent networks. Neural Information Processing, 43-52. DARGAN, KUMAR, AYYAGARI, survey its paradigm Archives Methods Engineering, 1-22. DE FILIPPIS, R., CARBONE, GAETANO, BRUNI, PUGLIESE, SEGURA-GARCIA, FAZIO, Machine structural functional MRI approach schizophrenia: systematic review. Neuropsychiatric treatment, 15, 1605. LIMA, DA SILVA-FILHO, DOS SANTOS, Detection masses mammographic multi-kernel approach. programs biomedicine, 134, 11-29. DWIVEDI, HUGHES, ISMAGILOVA, AARTS, COOMBS, C., CRICK, T., DUAN, EDWARDS, EIRUG, (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives emerging challenges, opportunities, agenda research, practice policy. Management, 101994. ELGEDAWY, random forest, vector machines naïve Bayes. Engineering Science, 6, 19884-19889. FENG, CAO, J., XIE, YANG, knowledge-driven feature method multi-sequence MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging, 69, 40-48. GAO, GERAS, LEWIN, MOY, New frontiers: update age artificial intelligence. American Roentgenology, 212, 300-307. HAZRA, MANDAL, GUPTA, Study analysis cell Naïve Bayes, SVM Ensemble Algorithms. 145, 39-45. HENRIKSEN, CARLSEN, F., VEJBORG, I. NIELSEN, LAURIDSEN, The efficacy mammography screening: Acta Radiologica, 60, 13-18. HOSSAM, HARB, ABD EL KADER, thermography. JES. Sciences, 12-32. HOUSSEIN, EMAM, ALI, SUGANTHAN, Deep imaging-based cancer: comprehensive Expert 114161. YASMIN, NAYAK, Stomach deformities recognition rank-based features selection. systems, 43, 1-15. KIM, C.-M., PARK, HONG, Mass eLFA Algorithm Based CRNN Learning Model. IEEE Access, 8, 197312-197323. KONG, KENDALL, STONE, NOTINGHER, Raman spectroscopy diagnostics—From in-vitro biofluid assays in-vivo Advanced drug delivery reviews, 89, 121-134. KOROTCOV, TKACHENKO, RUSSO, EKINS, Comparison metrics diverse discovery sets. Molecular pharmaceutics, 4462-4475. LANGLOTZ, ALLEN, ERICKSON, KALPATHY-CRAMER, BIGELOW, COOK, T. FLANDERS, LUNGREN, MENDELSON, RUDIE, roadmap foundational research imaging: NIH/RSNA/ACR/The Academy Workshop. Radiology, 291, 781-791. MALATHI, SINTHIA, FARZANA, MARY, active contour belief Materials Today: Proceedings. MORRA, SACCHETTO, DURANDO, AGLIOZZO, CARBONARO, DELSANTO, PESCE, PERSANO, MARISCOTTI, MARRA, tomosynthesis. 277, 56-63. MURTAZA, SHUIB, WAHAB, MUJTABA, NWEKE, AL-GARADI, ZULFIQAR, RAZA, AZMI, learning-based through modalities: state art challenges. Review, 1-66. OBAID, I., MOHAMMED, GHANI, MOSTAFA, TAHA, Evaluating performance Wisconsin Cancer. 7, 160-166. QI, ZHANG, PI, LV, YI, Z. Automated ultrasonography 185-198. RAJINIKANTH, SATAPATHY, FERNANDES, NACHIAPPAN, Entropy tumor brain MR images–a teaching optimization. Pattern Recognition Letters, 94, 87-95. ROSLIDAR, SADDAMI, ARNIA, SYUKRI, MUNADI, fine-tuning CNN models thermal 2019 Cybernetics (CyberneticsCom), 77-81. SENKAMALAVALLI, BHUVANESWARI, Improved hybrid Research 5, 237467. SHARMA, AGGARWAL, CHOUDHURY, algorithms. Techniques, Electronics Mechanical (CTEMS), 114-118. SILVA, BORRÉ, CASTILLO, CASTRO, VARELA, Integration ensemble predicting export potential company. Procedia 151, 1194-1200. SMITH, ANDREWS, BROOKS, FEDEWA, MANASSARAM‐BAPTISTE, SASLOW, BRAWLEY, WENDER, United States, 2018: current Society guidelines issues screening. CA: journal clinicians, 68, 297-316. SOCIETY, facts figures 2019–2020. Am. Soc, 1-44. STENROOS, Object SYEDA-MAHMOOD, Role big decision radiology. College 569-576. TAHMOORESI, AFSHAR, RAD, NOWSHATH, BAMIAH, Early Telecommunication, Electronic (JTEC), 10, 21-27. TESFAYE, SELVARAJAH, GANDHI, GREIG, SHILLO, FANG, WILKINSON, Diabetic peripheral neuropathy may not be name suggests: evidence magnetic imaging. Pain, 157, S72-S80. cancer. Sensors, 17, 1572. YAP, PONS, MARTI, GANAU, SENTIS, ZWIGGELAAR, DAVISON, lesions biomedical health informatics, 22, 1218-1226. YARI, NGUYEN, applied histological 162432-162448. YASSIN, OMRAN, HOUBY, ALLAM, computer different 156, 25-45. ZULUAGA-GOMEZ, MASRY, Z., BENAGGOUNE, MERAGHNI, ZERHOUNI, CNN-based methodology Biomechanics Engineering: Visualization, ISMAIL, SOVUTHY, technique. UNIMAS STEM 12th (EnCon), 89-92. LI, Method Network Aid. 2021 Asia-Pacific Computers (IPEC), 536-540. AMKRANE, ADOUI, BENJELLOUN, Towards Response Radiomics. 2020 5th Cloud Intelligence: Technologies Applications (CloudTech), 1-5. NIU, LIU, GONG, X. Domain Knowledge Powered Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Videos. CHOUGRAD, ZOUAKI, ALHEYANE, BIOMEDICINE, 19-30. DAS, MOHANTY, MALLICK, MUHAMMAD, ZHU, CONTROL method. 70, 103009. HIRRA, AHMAD, HUSSAIN, ASHRAF, QADRI, ALGHAMDI, ALFAKEEH, From Histopathological Patch-Based Modeling. 9, 24273-24287. HU, Q., WHITNEY, GIGER, improved multiparametric 1-11. SINGH, SAXENA, LAKSHMANAN, SANGAIAH, CHAUHAN, SHRIVASTAVA, histopathological canine mammary tumors human 508, 405-421. MENDEL, SHETH, Transfer diagnosis: comparison tomosynthesis mammography. 26, 735-743. SURENDHAR, VASUKI, cancers algorithm. LUTTRELL IV, 80. TAN, LIN, CHENG, SATO, Deep-learning-empowered auxiliary 5GB remote E-health. 28, 54-61.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Diagnosing Breast Cancer by Machine Learning

Background and Aim: Cancer and in particular Breast cancer are among the diseases that have the highest mortality rate in Iran after heart disease. The accurate prognosis for Breast cancer is important, and the presence of various symptoms and features of this disease makes it difficult for doctors to diagnose. This study aimed to identify the factors affecting Breast cancer, modeling and ultim...

متن کامل

the relationship between using language learning strategies, learners’ optimism, educational status, duration of learning and demotivation

with the growth of more humanistic approaches towards teaching foreign languages, more emphasis has been put on learners’ feelings, emotions and individual differences. one of the issues in teaching and learning english as a foreign language is demotivation. the purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the components of language learning strategies, optimism, duration o...

15 صفحه اول

Deep Learning for Identifying Metastatic Breast Cancer

The International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) held a grand challenge to evaluate computational systems for the automated detection of metastatic breast cancer in whole slide images of sentinel lymph node biopsies. Our team won both competitions in the grand challenge, obtaining an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.925 for the task of whole slide image classification ...

متن کامل

Using Three Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence

Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women, affecting about 10% of all women at some stages of their life. In recent years, the incidence rate keeps increasing and data show that the survival rate is 88% after five years from diagnosis and 80% after 10 years from diagnosis [1]. Early prediction of breast cancer is one of the most crucial works in the follow-up process. D...

متن کامل

Using Three Machine Learning Techniques for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence

Introduction Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women, affecting about 10% of all women at some stages of their life. In recent years, the incidence rate keeps increasing and data show that the survival rate is 88% after five years from diagnosis and 80% after 10 years from diagnosis [1]. Early prediction of breast cancer is one of the most crucial works in the follow-up process. D...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: ZANCO Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2412-3986', '2218-0230']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21271/zjpas.34.2.3